【以伟大的名义暂行苟且】

2007/03/16

紧急援助业务URGENT BUSINESS ASSISTANCE

这封信其实是我2天前收到的,相同内容的信我总共收到两封,一封在收件箱里,一封在垃圾箱里,当时我很诧异。
信中的内容,如果我相信了,那么我现在很有可能已经是个富翁了,但我现在既然没有相信,所以,我还是个穷光蛋。

公开这封信的目的不为其他,只为让大家都不要成百万富翁。以下是信的全文:

URGENT BUSINESS ASSISTANCE
ATTN:PRESIDENT/C.E.O,

Good day! My name is MR. john moyo the Chief Auditor of FIRST NATIONAL BANK
OF SOUTH AFRICA (FNB) there is an account opened in this bank in 1980 and
since 1990 nobody has operated on this account again. After going through
some old files in the records, I discovered that if I do not remit this
money out urgently it would be forfeited. The owner of this account is
Mr.Andreas B. Smith, a foreigner and a Miner at Kruger Gold Company. A
Geologist by profession died in 1990.

No one knows about this account or anything concerning it the account has no
other beneficiary and the investigation proves to me as well that his
company does not know anything about this account and the amount in the
account at the moment is US$18. 5 Million Dollars (Eighteen Million Five
Hundred Thousand United States Dollars).

As the money is in United States Dollars I need a foreign partner/account to
transfer the money overseas thus I am contacting you. Please kindly indicate
and if so contact me on the above phone numbers to enable me inform you on
next step to take. I need your full co-operation to make this transaction
work because the management is ready to approve this payment to any
foreigner who has correct information on this account, which I will give you
if you indicate your interest. I hope you can be able to handle such amount
in strict confidence because this opportunity will never come again in my
life. I need truthful person in this business relationship because I don’t
want to make any mistake. I need your strong assurance and confidentiality.

With my position now in the office I can transfer this money to any reliable
foreign account, with assurance that this money will be intact pending my
physical arrival in your country for sharing. All documents regarding this
transaction will be destroyed once I receive confirmation of the money in
your account thus leaving no trace to anything.
I will apply for annual leave to get visa immediately on confirmation to
receive this fund into your designated account with appropriate clearance
forms from the Ministries and Foreign Exchange Departments.

At the conclusion of this business you will be given 25% of the total
amount, 70% will be for me, while 5% will be for expenses that we might
incured during the course of this transaction.

Finally, please if you are interested in this transaction, all I want you to
do is to send me your Private Mobile Phone and Fax Numbers for Easy
Communication including Your Personal Bank Account Details. Please kindly
call me on the above private phone numbers While I’m looking forward to
receive your immediate reply by phone or email as soon as you receive this
letter.
Thanks And God Bless.
NB you can contact me with this email address johnmoyo_5@hotmail.com.

______________________________

___________________________________
Share folders without harming wildlife!
http://www.communicationevolved.com/en-za/

2007/03/15

日本人性爱少 出生率一直降

联合早报看到的消息
这则消息让我知道了三点:第一,日本也有个叫"计划生育"的机构(拥有相同和更大职能的机构在我国叫"国家人口和计划生育委员会"),这种人口控制的协会或组织我原本以为只有cn才有。
当然,这第一点并不是我要说的关键,甚至是可以算做题外话的。下面是至关重要的第二点:
"有39.7%年龄介于16至49岁的日本人,可以一个多月没有一次性生活……即使在已婚夫妇当中,处于这种状况的人也占34.6%。"这一点让我相当的惊讶,原本以为jp拥有如此发达的情色产业,jp人一定是make的好手。没想到大部分jp都是外强中干。
当然是不是这些jp都是不能立正或都干涸了,我也不能很肯定的下个定论,从那些不是从中关村买来的毛片来看,jp还是很厉害的。
看来日本人的压力真的是太大了,普通的压力可以通过外部释放来缓解,过大的压力只能通过自我摧残来转移注意了。
虽然这消息并不重要,但足可那些花着爷娘辛苦血汗钱去买jp(不是极品哦~)货,一面又喊着消灭小日本的人高兴一阵子了。
第三点也不是很重要,日本的这个机构把16岁的人也纳入了应该拥有正常性生活的范畴。
 

2007/03/12

昨天的一个梦。

昨天夜里我做了一个梦,现在想来都有点耸人听闻。

梦的内容是这样的:
"美国为了遏制中国,对日本进行了核轰炸"

但愿这荒诞的梦永远不会是真的。

2007/03/11

针对Mozilla Firefox做了优化

其实说白了,我一直是个中立者,我使用google的大部分,但大量的搜索需要却是通过baidu来实现的,虽然也用google的搜索,但我怕了gfw,经常查着查着就“该页无法显示”。
早期(这个早期不是指pc发展的早期,是我刚买这台pc的时候~)我是个Firefox的爱好者。但国内大量不能正常显示的网页使我最终回到了IE。
再后来,我选择了maxthon,但我的默认浏览器一直是ie,这对我来说是个妥协。
直到今天,我无意间浏览一个网页时,出现了“你目前使用的浏览器是ie,这似乎不是一个好主意”
不知是为什么,我突然间感到有股难以掩饰的冲动,我忍不住下载了
Firefox。

当我安装好后,我发现,它比以前好多了,或许是不断增加的占有率使得网页设计者们开始重视在
Firefox下的浏览质量。

当我用我的新
Firefox浏览我的这个blog时,我惊呆了,简直糟透了!
于是我做了一些小小的优化。

p.s. 上面的文风有点像是翻译的文章,我不知到这是怎么搞的,简直糟透了!以后要改变这种笔风了……

最牛B的十大劫案

无意间看到的文章,现在转过来,可喜我把原文的地址给忘了。

Ten Greatest Robberies of all time
Central Bank of Iraq (2003): Saddam took US$1 billion a day before the warIn March 2003, on several occasions beginning on March 18, the day before the United States began bombing Baghdad, nearly US$1 billion was stolen from the Central Bank of Iraq. This is considered the largest bank heist in history. Approximately $650 million was later found hidden in walls in Saddam Hussein 's palace by US troops. It is believed that this was the bulk of the stolen money. The remaining money is currently unaccounted for. Diyaa Habib al-Khayoun, general manager of the state-owned al-Rafidain Bank, claims that $250 million and 18 billion now worthless Iraqi dinars were also stolen, but by professional robbers unconnected to Saddam. In March 2003, a hand-written note surfaced, signed by Saddam, ordering $920 million to be withdrawn and given to his son Qusay. Bank officials state that Qusay and another unidentified man oversaw the cash, boxes of $100 bills, being loaded into trucks during a five hour operation. Qusay was later killed by US troops in a firefight. Boston Museum (1990): dressed as police officers, stole US$300 million worth in paintingsHours after St. Patrick's Day festivities wrapped up in Boston on March 18, 1990, two men dressed as police officers knocked on the security entrance side door of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum at 1:24 a.m. "The policy has always been that you don't open that door in the middle of the night for God. Why on this one night they opened the door no one can explain," Lyle Grindle, the museum's current head of security, told Access Control & Security Systems, a security industry trade publication. Grindle was not in charge of security at the time of the 1990 heist. Just minutes after letting them in, the guards quickly learned that the late night visitors weren't real cops. Though they apparently did not brandish any weapons, the intruders managed to overpower the two guards. They handcuffed the guards, bound them with duct tape and left them in the basement. In the fewer than 90 minutes that followed, the bandits went through the museum's Dutch Room on the second floor and stole three Rembrandts, including the Dutch artist's only seascape, "Storm on the Sea of Galilee." It was one of several works the thieves savagely cut to release it from its frame, leaving ragged edges of the canvas behind in otherwise empty frames, which continue to hang in the museum to this day. Also taken from that room was "The Concert" by Vermeer, as well as a Chinese bronze beaker located near the Rembrandt. The thieves also apparently tried to steal a fourth Rembrandt but were unsuccessful. Nearby, they also made off with "Landscape with an Obelisk," an oil painting by Govaert Flinck that was until recently attributed to Rembrandt, Flinck's mentor. On the other side of the floor, the thieves went into the Short Gallery and ripped five Degas sketches from the wall. Feet away a bronze eagle that adorned the top of a Napoleonic flag was also pillaged. A Manet portrait, located in the museum's Blue Room on the first floor, capped off the list of works the thieves stole. It is not known in what order the rooms were ransacked, since the thieves ripped out the surveillance tape before fleeing the museum with it. To this day, the small museum isn't able to collect insurance, since it carried no insurance policy at the time of the heist. Knightsbridge Security Deposit (1987): requested to rent a safe deposit box, then subdued the manager and stole US$111 millionThe Knightsbridge Security Deposit robbery took place on 12 July 1987 in Knightsbridge, England, part of the City of Westminster in London. Two men entered the Knightsbridge Safe Deposit Centre and requested to rent a Safe deposit box. After being shown into the vault, they produced hand guns and subdued the manager and security guards. The thieves then hung a sign on the street level door explaining that the Safe Deposit Centre was temporarily closed, whilst letting in further accomplices. They broke open many of the safe deposit boxes and left with a hoard estimated to be worth £40 million (equivalent to roughly US$66 million at the 1987 exchange rate; the inflation-adjusted value would be £63.6 million --$111 million-- as of 2005). One hour after the robbers departed, one of the guards managed to escape his handcuffs to raise the alarm. Police forensic investigators at the crime scene recovered a fingerprint that was traced to the Italian Valerio Viccei. After a period of surveillance, Viccei and several of his accomplices were arrested during a series of coordinated raids on 12 August 1987 and later convicted of the crime. Viccei would later published a book on the robbery. Kent Securitas Depot (2006): abducted the manager, then stole USD$92.5 millionThe Securitas depot robbery was a robbery which took place in the early hours of 22 February 2006, between 01:00 and 02:15 UTC in England, an operation that succeeded in stealing the largest cash amount in British crime history. At least six men abducted and threatened the family of the manager, tied up fourteen staff members and stole £53,116,760 (about US$92.5 million or €78 million) in bank notes from a Securitas Cash Management Ltd depot in Vale Road, Tonbridge, Kent. The manager of the depot, Colin Dixon, was abducted at about 18:30 on 21 February, apparently while driving his Nissan Almera to his home in Herne Bay. He was pulled over on the A249 just outside Stockbury, a village North East of Maidstone, by what he thought was an unmarked police vehicle due to the blue lights behind the front grill. A man approached him in high-visibility clothing and a police-style hat. The manager proceeded to get into the police imposter's car, thinking that he was a police officer, where he was then handcuffed by others in the vehicle. He was then driven west on the M20 motorway to the West Malling bypass where he was bound further, transferred into a white van and transported to a farm in an unknown location in west Kent. As this was taking place, the manager's wife and eight-year-old son were being held hostage at their home in Herne Bay, after they answered the door to men dressed in police uniforms, who falsely informed them that the manager had been involved in a road traffic accident. They were then driven to the farm at which the manager was being held, where he was told at gunpoint that failure to cooperate could put him and his family in danger. The depot manager, his wife and son were taken to the Securitas depot in Tonbridge at around 01:00, travelling in a plain white van, being held at gunpoint. At the depot, 14 members of staff were bound by robbers, armed with handguns and wearing balaclavas. The heist came to an end at approximately 02:15, although it was still another hour before staff members, who had been tied up, managed to raise the alarm. Police officers arriving on the scene discovered staff, the manager and his family, bound but physically unharmed. Great Train Robbery (1963): stole US$74 million without gunsThe Great Train Robbery was the name given to a £2.3 million train robbery committed on 8 August 1963 at Bridego Railway Bridge, Ledburn near Mentmore in Buckinghamshire, England. The Royal Mail's Glasgow to London travelling post office (TPO) train was stopped by tampered signals. A 15-member gang, led by Bruce Reynolds and including Ronnie Biggs, Charlie Wilson, Jimmy Hussey, John Wheater, Brian Field, Jimmy White, Tommy Wisbey, Gordon Goody and Buster Edwards, stole £2.3 million in used £1, £5 and £10 notes — the equivalent of £40 million (US $74 million) in 2006. Although no guns were used in the robbery, the train driver, Jack Mills, was hit on the head with an iron bar, causing a black eye and facial bruising. The assailant was one of three members of the gang never to be arrested or identified. Frank Williams (at the time a Detective Inspector) claims to have traced the man, but he could not be charged because of lack of evidence. Mills recovered fully from the attack and died in 1970 from leukemia. Thirteen of the gang members were caught after police discovered their fingerprints at their hideout at Leatherslade Farm, near Oakley, Buckinghamshire. The robbers were tried, sentenced and imprisoned. Ronnie Biggs escaped from prison 15 months into his sentence, settling in Melbourne Australia, and later moving to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, when police found out his Melbourne address. Charlie Wilson escaped and was living outside Montreal, Canada on Rigaud Mountain. In the upper-middle-class neighbourhood where the large, secluded properties are surrounded by trees, Wilson was just another resident who enjoyed his privacy. Only when his wife made the mistake of telephoning his parents in England was Scotland Yard able to track him down. Banco Central in Brazil (2005): tunneled 255 feet up to the bank, then stole US$69.8 millionOn the weekend of August 6 and August 7, 2005 a gang of burglars, suspected to be either the Gang of the Tattooed or Primeiro Comando da Capital, tunneled into the Banco Central in Fortaleza. They removed five containers of 50-real notes, with an estimated value of 164,755,150 reais (US$69.8 million, £38.6 million, €56 million). The money was uninsured; a bank spokeswoman stated that the risks were too small to justify the insurance premiums. The burglars managed to evade or disable the bank's internal alarms and sensors; the burglary remained undiscovered until the bank opened for business on the morning of Monday, August 8. The Banco Central is a national banking institution charged with control of the money supply. The money in the vault was being examined to see if it should be recirculated or destroyed. The bills were not numbered sequentially, making them almost impossible to trace. Three months earlier, the gang of burglars had rented an empty property in the centre of the city and then tunneled 78 meters (255 ft) beneath two city blocks to a position beneath the bank. The gang had renovated a house and put up a sign indicating it was a landscaping company selling both natural and artificial grass as well as plants. Neighbours, who estimated that the gang consisted of between six and ten men, described how they had seen van-loads of soil being removed daily, but understood this to be a normal activity of the business. The tunnel, being roughly 70 cm ( 2.3 ft) square and running 4 meters (13 ft) beneath the surface, was well-constructed: it was lined with wood and plastic and had its own lighting and air conditioning systems. On the final weekend, the gang broke through 1.1 meters (3.6 ft) of steel-reinforced concrete to enter the bank vault. The bank notes weighed approximately 3,500 kg (approx. 7,700 lbs) and would have required a considerable amount of time and effort to remove. On October 22 the body of the suspected mastermind, Luis Fernando Ribeiro, 26, was found 9 October on an isolated road near Camanducaia, 200 miles (320 km) west of Rio de Janeiro. He had been shot seven times and had marks on his wrists as if he had been handcuffed. Five men were arrested September 28 with about $5.4 million of the money and told the police they had helped dig the tunnel. So far, authorities have recovered more than $7 million but $63 million remains unaccounted for. Northern Bank (2004): bank officials threatened to help steal US$50 millionThe Northern Bank robbery was a large robbery of cash from the headquarters of the Northern Bank in Belfast, Northern Ireland. Carried out by a large, proficient group on 20 December 2004, the gang seized £26.5 million in pounds sterling, making it one of the biggest bank robberies in British history. The police and the British and Irish governments claimed the Provisional IRA was responsible (or had permitted others to undertake the raid), a claim vehemently denied by the Provisional IRA itself and the Sinn Féin political party. The robbery, and the allegations and counter-allegations surrounding it, threw the Northern Ireland peace process into crisis. On the night of Sunday December 19, 2004 groups of armed men called at the homes of two officials of the Northern Bank, one in Downpatrick in County Down, the other in Poleglass, near Belfast. Masquerading as police officers, they entered the homes and held the officials and their families at gunpoint. Bank official Chris Ward was taken from Poleglass to Downpatrick, the home of his supervisor Kevin McMullan, while gunmen remained at his home with his family. Subsequently Mr McMullan's wife was taken from their home and held, also at gunpoint, at an unknown location. The following day both officials were instructed to report for work at the bank's headquarters at Belfast's Donegall Square West as normal. They did so, and remained at work after the close of business, and later in the evening they gave admittance to other members of the gang. The robbers entered the bank's cash handling and storage facility. This held an unusually large amount of cash, in preparation for distribution to ATMs for the busy Christmas shopping season. Cash was transferred to one or several vehicles (possibly including a white "Luton" van) at the premises' Wellington Street entrance, and the gang fled. Shortly before midnight the gang holding the Ward family left, and those holding Mrs McMullan released her in a forest near Ballynahinch. The haul included £10m of uncirculated Northern Bank sterling banknotes, £5.5m of used Northern Bank sterling notes, £4.5m of circulated sterling notes issued by other banks, and small amounts of other currencies, largely Euros and U.S. Dollars. Brinks Mat warehouse (1983): broke into warehouse to find ten tonnes of gold bullion worth US$45 millionThe Brinks Mat Robbery occurred on 26 November 1983 when six robbers broke into the Brinks Mat warehouse at Heathrow Airport, England. The robbers thought they were going to steal £3 million in cash; however when they arrived they found ten tonnes of gold bullion (worth £26 million). The gang got into the warehouse thanks to security guard Anthony Black, who was the brother-in-law of the raid's architect Brian Robinson. Scotland Yard quickly discovered the family connection and Black confessed to aiding and abetting the raiders, providing them with a key to the main door and giving them details of security measures. Tried at the Old Bailey, Robinson and gang leader Michael McAvoy were each sentenced to 25 years imprisonment for armed robbery. Black got six years, and served three. Prior to his conviction McAvoy had entrusted part of his share to an associate John Perry. Perry recruited Kenneth Noye (who had links with a legitimate gold dealer in Bristol) to dispose of the gold. Noye melted down the bullion and recast it for sale. However the sudden movements of large amounts of money through a Bristol bank came to the notice of the Treasury who informed the police. Noye was placed under police surveillance and in January 1985 killed an officer he discovered in his garden. At the resulting trial the jury found him not guilty on the grounds of self-defence. In 1986 Noye was found guilty of conspiracy to handle the Brinks Mat gold, fined £700,000 and sentenced to 14 years in prison. Three tonnes of stolen gold has never been recovered. It is claimed that anyone wearing gold jewellery bought in the UK after 1983, is probably wearing Brinks Mat. Dunbar Armored (1997): inside man steals US$18.9 million The Dunbar Armored robbery is the largest cash robbery to have occurred in the United States. It occurred in 1997 at the Dunbar Armored facility in Los Angeles, California. The thieves made off with some 18.9 million U.S. Dollars. The robbery was masterminded by Allen Pace, who worked for Dunbar as a regional safety inspector. While on the job, Pace had time to photograph and examine the company's Los Angeles armored car depot. He recruited five of his childhood friends, and on the night of Friday, September 13, 1997, Pace used his keys to gain admittance to the facility. Pace had timed the security cameras and determined how they could be avoided. Once inside, they waited within the staff cafeteria, ambushing the guards one by one. Pace knew that on Friday nights the vault was open due to the large quantities of money being moved. Rushing the vault guards, the robbers managed to subdue them before they could signal any alarms. In half an hour, the robbers had loaded millions of dollars into a waiting U-Haul. Pace knew exactly which bags contained the highest denomination and non-sequential bills. He also knew where the recording devices for the security cameras were located and took these. The police immediately realized it was an inside job and closely examined Pace, but could find nothing. The gang worked hard to conceal their new wealth, laundering it through property deals and phony businesses. Eventually, one of the gang members, Eugene Lamar Hill, erred when he gave an unknowing associate a stack of bills still wrapped with the original cash straps. The associate went to the police and Hill was arrested. Hill soon confessed and named his associates. Allen Pace was arrested and sentenced to twenty-four years in jail. Only a fraction of the money was ever recovered. Some $10 million is still unaccounted for. Lufthansa (1978): US$5.8 million at Kennedy AirportThe 1978 Lufthansa Heist was planned by Jimmy Burke (immortalized in Martin Scorcese's Goodfellas), an associate of the Lucchese crime family, and carried out by several of his associates. It all began when bookmaker, Martin Krugman, told Henry Hill (an associate of Jimmy Burke's) about millions of dollars in untraceable money. The money was flown in once a month and was the money exchanged by servicemen and tourists in West Germany and that it was stored in a cardboard vault at Kennedy Airport. The information had come from Louis Werner, who owed Krugman $20,000 in gambling debts and worked at the airport. On December 11th, at 3.12 a.m. a guard, named Kelly Whalen, patrolling the cargo terminal, spotted a black Ford Econoline van pulling into a bay near a loading platform, for vaults. Whalen walked toward the loading bay, to investigate this peculiar appartion and was struck over the head with a .45 pistol. A wiry man in a black ski mask pulled his mask over his face as the blood began to pour from Whalen's wound. Another man grabbed Whalen's gun and thus disarmed him. Whalen was ordered, by the two men, to disarm the silent alarm, after he did this he was handcuffed behind his back. He saw a series of other men, all carrying rifles or pistols, running into the cargo terminal and then another man took his wallet and said that they knew where his family were and that they had men ready to visit them. Whalen nodded to indicate that he would co-operate with the thieves. Another guard, Rolf Rebmann, heard a noise by the loading ramp and when he went to investigate, 6 armed, masked men forced their way in and handcuffed him. They then used a one of a kind key from Werner and walked through a maze of corridors to where the two other employees would be. Once these two had been rounded up two gunmen ventured downstairs to look for unexpected visitors and then the other men marched the employees to a lunch room, where the other employees were on a 3 a.m. break. The gunmen burst into the lunch room and brandishing their firearms they showed a bloodied Whalen as an indication of their intentions if anyone got out of line. They knew each employee by name and forced them onto the ground. They made John Murray, the terminal's senior cargo agent, call Rudi Eirich on the intercom. The robbers knew that Eirich was the only guard that night who knew the right combinations to open the double door vault. Murray was made to pretend, to Eirich, that there was a problem with a load from Frankfurt and told Eirich to meet him in the cafeteria. As Eirich approached the cafe he was met by two shotguns and he saw the other employees, bound and gagged on the cafeteria floor. One gunman kept watch over the 10 employees and the other 3 took Eirich, at gun point, down two flights of stairs to the double door vault. He later reported that the men were informed and knew all about the safety systems in the vault and they knew about the double door system, whereby one door must be shut or the other one can't be opened or the alarm will be activated. The men ordered Eirich to open up the first door, to a 10-by-20 foot room. They knew that if he opened up the second door he would activate an alarm to the Port Authority. Once inside they ordered Eirich to lie on the ground and they then began sifting through invoices and freight manifests to determine which parcels they wanted of the many similarly wrapped ones. Finally they began hurling parcels through, one nearly hit Eirich's head, he saw it kicked open and said that inside was stacks and stacks of cash. Around 40 parcels were removed and Eirich was made to lock the inner door before unlocking the outer door because this would trigger an alarm to the Port Authority office. Two of the gunmen were assigned to load the parcels into the vans while the others tied up Eirich. A man, without a ski mask on, burst into the cafeteria and was euphoric, he said to the other gunmen that they had the money in the vans. He was quickly told to put on his ski mask by the other thieves, however some of the employees caught a glimpse of his face. They were told not to call the Port Authority until 4:30 a.m., when the men left it was 4:16 a.m. according to the cafeteria clock and no calls were made until 4:30, when a report of $5 million in cash and $875,000 in jewels being stolen was made. The employees complied because they knew if the police caught the men they or their families would be harmed or even killed. The robbery took only 64 minutes and was the largest cash robbery ever committed on American soil at the time.

2007/03/10

超级郁闷――――Aolo的博客

今天闲的发慌,在网上到处逛。
无意间访问到sogou.com。我在浏览了它的首页后看到有个"G邮箱"的链接,想:啊,google不会不开眼到和sogou合作吧,他们在搜索上可是竞争对手啊。于是连忙点开看。哦,原来是sogou自己搞的邮箱。
继续闲的发慌,继续在网上逛。
又访问到一个logo在线生成网站,哈哈,在上面玩了一会,看到该网站还提供邮箱图片生成。于是点开来看,哦哦,提供的邮箱种类很多啊。
(我这人十全十美,但就一点不好,爱瞎联系,原本这个logo在线生成网站和sogou屁不相关,我偏要凑到一起。我一看提供的邮箱图片在线生成里没有sogou的,心就痒,倒不是为sogou打抱不平。)
于是我自己打开PS,又从网上下载了sogou的logo,自己动手做了一个:
超级郁闷

做好了!我对自己的这个"作品"很满意。

啊,突然想到我还没有注册呢,于是赶紧跑去注册,但是,超级郁闷的是,mianjv这个账号,已经被人注册了!!!我白忙活了!!!
哎,天道无常,那我就做一个好人吧,一会联系下这个邮箱,把这图片送给他,哎~~~~

2007/03/09

龙应台:不会闹事的一代――给大学生

今年5月27日的《纽约客》杂志有这样一篇文章:

我的母亲生在柏林,侥幸逃过犹太人的大屠杀。今年母亲节,我请她去看场电影。这部影片非常卖座,故事好像与非洲的黑人有关。排队买票的行列很长。有一个年轻白人在行列间来往发散传单,劝大家不要买票,因为这部片子是南非制作的。排队的人大概都想的和我一样:"看不看由我自己决定,不用你来告诉我。"所以没人理他。

入场之后,灯黑了电影正要开始,前座的两个年轻女孩突然站起来面对观众,大声地演讲,解释这部影片如何地蔑视南非黑人的惨境,希望大家抵制。观众中嘘声四起,有人不耐烦地大叫:"这里是美国;你要抗议到外面去!"也有生气的声音喊着:"我们付了五块钱电影票,让我们自己决定爱看不看!"偶尔有个微弱的声音说:"听听她们说什么也好!"但是群众的喊声愈来愈大:"出去!出去!出去!"

坐在我身边的母亲显得很难过,她转身对我说:"这两个年轻女孩竟然愿意花十块钱买票进入一个人人喊打的地方来――或许她们真有点道理也说不定。"

在大家的鼓掌声中,戏院的工作人员很粗暴地把那两个女生架走了。灯又黑下来,但是没几分钟,一个年轻人,带着浓厚的英国腔,站起来说:"这是一部充满种族歧视的影片――"愤怒的观众打断了他的话,有人在叫警察,但这个青年毫无惧色,继续大声说:"你们不让我把话说完,我是不会走的!"群众喊着:"滚蛋!滚蛋!"好不客易,来了两个警察,笑容满面地把那家伙给请了出去。

观众情绪还没有完全稳定下来,一个廿来岁、一脸胡子的小伙子在后排突然站了起来,说:"不不,我跟他们不是一道的;我跟你们一样买了票纯粹来看戏的。我只是想到,或许对于这样一个影响千万人一生的问题,我们应该有个坚定的道德立场,而不只是追求消遣而已。如果五十年前的人也像刚刚这几个人这样对被迫害的犹太人执着的话,我的祖父也许可以活到今天,不至于死在德国的煤气房里。"然后我就听到一个非常熟悉沙哑的声音突然响起:"他说的一点不错;你可别想叫我闭嘴!"我发觉我六十四岁的老母亲站了起来,面对着整个戏院;她全身在颤抖。

这一则不起眼的小故事可以招引出许多值得争议的问题来。譬如说,这几个为道德感所驱使的年轻人有没有权利阻止别人看这部"种族歧视"的电影?如果我也在戏院里,我会是愤怒的群众之一,叫他们"滚蛋"主要的原因是,他们没有权利主宰我的思想――这个电影究竟如何要由我自己看过了再作决定。其次,如果这一撮以"道德感"为理由的小团体能打断我的电影,那么,一个宗教团体、政治党派、商业集团等等,都可以肆意地来强迫推销它的理想,那个人还有什么自由自主可言?

南非的是非善恶也是个棘手的问题。它的种族隔离政策现在是千夫所指,万人唾弃。南非的白人简直是廿世纪的污点。事情的另外一面却是:南非若由黑人自决自主,恐怕歧视与屠杀会比现况更为剧烈――看看乌干达!看看整个非洲大陆!

但是《纽约客》这篇短文令我沉思许久的,却是这几个年轻抗议分子的行为。他们不算少数;哥伦比亚大学在南非有金钱的投资,哥大的学生也曾经热烈地示威过,反对学校当局"善恶不分"的和稀泥作风。而在戏院里"捣乱"的这些年轻人,事实上是一次一次地花五块钱买票――对学生而言,五块钱不是个小数目;进到戏院去让群众嘘骂,然后一次一次地被踢出来。这些人中,当然难免会有少数是为了幼稚的英雄主义或纯粹嬉闹,但大部分的,是为了一个道德立场,择善固执的理想。在一个人决定到戏院去"闹事"之前,他必须先具有三个条件。第一,他关心这个世界;因为关心,所以才会去注意南非黑人的困境。第二,他能作价值判断。对南非种族问题的报导纷纭不一,他得自己决定站在黑白那一边。第三,他有充分的道德勇气,充分到促使他付诸行动的地步。于是,他走到戏院去买票;五块钱,他很可以拿去溜冰或吃掉。

我们的年轻人呢?或者,缩小一点范围,我们的大学生呢?有多少人具备这三个品质?

就我有限的观察,非常、非常的少。以对社会的关心而言,我们的学生在大学的四面围墙里自给自足地活着,不常把头伸出来。几个月前,当十四位省议员集体辞职时,我曾经对几百位学生作过测验,要他们写下议员辞职的原因,结果正如预料,有少数给了支离破碎而模糊的答案,显然是浏览报纸后的残余印象。百分之八十却很率直地回答:"不知道!"

为什么不知道?当然是因为缺乏兴趣,不关心。坊间杂志选出来的大学校园"美女",被人问到社会问题时,娇滴滴地说:"好可怕哟!"吐吐舌头。这样"可爱"又"纯洁"的大学女生为数不少,而且讨人喜欢。我们的学生不仅只对台湾本身的社会、政治问题印象模糊,对台湾以外的国际情况就更陌生了。伊索匹亚的饥荒、乌干达的政变、南美的游击战、天主教廷对堕胎与离婚的立场、菲律宾的军队暴行等等,都不存在,都没有意义。

没有关心,自然没有做价值判断的需要。根本不知道南非有严重的种族问题。当然就不必去思索谁是谁非,因为无从思索起。没有关心,也就无所谓道德勇气和道德行动。非洲的幼儿可以死光,南美的军队可以强暴妇女,因为事不关己。海山的煤矿可以一崩再崩,桃园的古迹可以拆了又拆,内湖的垃圾山可以侥了再烧,事不关己。大学四年之中,只有两件值得关心的事:一是把朋友交好,以后有结婚的对象,一是把功课读好,将来有满意的出路。对社会的关心,对是非的判断能力,择善固执的勇气,都不在大学的围墙以内。

换句话说,我们的年轻人天真、单纯、听话;他们绝对不会到戏院里去"闹事"。

※※※

为什么大学生的关心面那样狭窄?主要原因之一是,他的环境不鼓励,甚至于试图阻碍,他对书本以外的兴趣。大概很少有父母没说过这句话:"你只要把书读好,其他什么都不要管!"大学以前这样说,为了应付联考。进了大学之后这样说,为了应付留考、托福、高考、研究所人考等。"只要把书读好,其他什么都不要管"这个金玉良言是应现代科举制度而产生的。读书的目的在求技能,用来敲开一层一层考试的门。研读哲学、历史、文学、经济等等,都不是为了增加人生的智慧与了解,而是为了取得谋生的技术。因为这种技术与人生无关,所以可以"什么都不要管"。

可是这个金玉良言实在是经不起考验的。在"其他什么都不要管"的前提下,书,根本就不可能读得好。譬如读经济,一个学生可以用课本里的各种定义与学理来解释"通货膨胀",可是要他分析为什么公务员的薪水要加百分之八他却目瞪口呆,我们能说他书读好了吗?譬如读文学,他可以熟读欧威尔的《一九八四》,洋洋洒洒地写篇论文讨论制度与个人的关系,但是要他对江南案件提出看法,他却一片空白,我们能说他把书读通了吗?

这个大千世界可以说是各个学科的实验室。学生在黑字白纸之间所学到的理论与例证,都还是抽象模糊的,只有在把知识带到人生的实验室里去观照验证之后,知识才能落实。要我们的学生封闭在大学的围墙里"其他什么都不要管",等于是把学问与人生割离,也等于要学游泳的人在岸上靠图解学游泳,却不沾水,或学解剖的人在暗室里看幻灯片学解剖,却不动刀子。

※※※

我们的学生不会"闹事",因为"闹事"的人要先有自己的主张――不是报纸社论,不是老师的看法,同学的意见,而是自己的主张。对我们单纯、天真的学生而言,独立作价值判断却是件非常困难的事。为什么?

高三那年,开始上三民主义。有个沉闷的下午,我在课本中看到一句话:"三民主义是最适合中国人的主义。"

就这么一句斩钉截铁的结论。我以为自己漏掉了编者解释引证的部分,把课本前前后后翻过,却找不到任何阐释。十七岁的我坐在书前,感觉到深深的挫折:要达到这样一个结论,课本编者应该一步一步来,先解释中国人是怎么样的一个民族,然后说明其他主义如何的不适用于中国社会,最后才能逻辑地演绎出"三民主义是最适合中国人的主义"这个结论。可是编者显然觉得这些辩证的过程毫无必要。

第二天,在课堂上我请求老师解释"为什么"。

老师很惊讶地望了我一眼,好脾气地一笑,回答:"课本这么写,你背起来就是。联考不会问你为什么。"

在我早期的求知过程中,这个小小的经验是个很大的挫折。基本上,课本编者与授课老师并不认为学生有自己作判断、下结论的能力,所以才会有这种"你别问为什么,记住我的答案就行"的态度。他们因此所剥夺于我的,是我求知的权利与独立判断的能力。

现在的教育方式和过去没有太大的改变,我们的教育者仍旧习惯于供给"结论",仍旧不习惯供给学生"方法",让他们自己去找结论。最能够反映这种现象的莫过于作文题目了。多少年来,任何考试中,学生面对的总是什么"学问为济世之本"、"忠勇为爱国之本"、"一分耕耘、一分收获"、"满招损、谦受益"之类的金玉良言。所谓金玉良言说穿了,也就是死了的人交代下来的"结论"。出这种约定俗成的题目可以塑造学生的思想,使他更紧密地成为传统的一分子,有它教育的意义。但是这种思想传递根本上就不容许独创,不容许学生下自己的结论。如果教育者真正的兴趣不在于学生对传统的妥协与认同,而在于他独立判断的能力,那么同样的题目就应该以疑问的方式出现:"一分耕耘确能导致一分收获吗?"'你是否同意学问为济世之本?"或者以挑战的方式:"试辩论'忠勇为爱国之本'一说。"

只有这样不"既定结论"的思想训练才能真正刺激学生睁着自己的眼睛去观察身边纷扰复杂的世界,用自己的头脑去理出头绪来。当我们的教育者习惯性地把作好的结论抛下,学生也就懒惰地把结论照章收下;他不需要辛辛苦苦地去思索、摸索。

※※※

在我们的环境里,一个能关心、能判断的学生,却也不太可能有任何道德行动。一般教育者对学生行动采取压抑与抵制的态度,目的在求校园的稳定。

有一个专科学生被同学指控偷窃,教官在原告的带领之下也确实在该生书包中找到赃物,但是在没有听过被告辩解之前,就令这名学生退学。几个大胆的同学出来主持正义,要求学校给被告一个自我辩护的机会。

事情结果如何不论,学校当局对这些挺身而出的学生却有个斩钉截铁的态度:"去读你的书,不要多管闲事。谁闹事,谁就记过。"

奇怪,为什么我们的公民伦理课一再地教导学生要见义勇为,要当仁不让,要择善固执,学生一旦实践了这些美丽的道德理想,我们却恐慌地去压制他?学生对学校措施有所不满而投书、开会、抗议的时候,不正是最好的公民教育机会,帮助学生学习如何去理性地、公平而民主地解决问题,为什么我们反而以记过处分作为镇压的手段?为了表面的安静稳定而扼杀年轻人的正义感,代价是否太高了一点?

敢于表达意见、敢于行动的学生在一次两次的申诫记过之后,当然也学会了保护自己;他发觉,这个社会根本不希望他有道德勇气或正义感。

※※※

我们的大学生是不会"闹事"的一群。在考试、舞会、郊游的世界中,没有什么值得"闹事"的题材。在是非善恶都已经由父母师长孔子孟子下了结论的世界中,没有什么难题值得重新省思、费心判断。在明哲保身、少做少错的环境中,更没有什么"闹事"的余地。我们的大学生天真、单纯、安分、听话。

可是,如果"闹事"也可以解释为"以行动来改变现状"的话,我们这不会闹事的一代就值得令人忧虑了。四年一过,他就成为社会中坚――一个不懂得关心社会,不会判别是非,不敢行动的社会中坚!公车应不应涨价?不清楚。路边水管爆破了,不是我的事。公营机构亏了多少纳税人的钱?不知道。核电厂会不会贻害万年?不知道。上司舞弊应不应告发?不知道。台湾往哪里去?不知道,不知道,不知道……

一个满足现状的民族不可能进步,但是要对现状不满,一个人必须先有所关心,用心观察,观察之后作判断,判断之后付诸行动。关心可以是感性的,只是对于生于斯长于斯的土地的一份爱,但是空有感情无济于事,它必须有冷静的理性的支持――判断与行动需要坚强的理性。

台湾的现状不能令人满意,但是已经有许多人在关心、判断之后开始了行动。最好的例子是消费者基金会的推动者,他们已经"闹"了不少事。台湾需要闹的事情还很多很多。以妇女问题来说,我们现有的妇女组织还停留在献花、慰问、穿漂亮的衣服开慈善晚会与孤儿拥抱的阶段。在同样的社会版里,我们读到七岁的男孩被母亲活活烫死、十岁的女孩被卖到妓女户、十三岁的女儿被养父强暴而怀孕、三十岁的妻子被丈夫打断肋骨――我们天真可爱的校园美女觉得将来没事可关心、可"闹"吗?

又是一个学期的开始,让我们想想从哪里做起吧!

原载一九八五年九月三日《中国时报・人间》
 
ps:在别人的blog上看到的文章,无助感又一次袭上心头,决定转载。